Popular Articles

The Trudeau Government’s Fake Fight Against Antisemitism- Part 45

The govt’s dealings with the Jewish community to fight antisemitism on the homefront (2)

Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article

According to Statistics Canada, “there were 15 more incidents targeting the Jewish population in 2020 compared with 2019, for a total of 321. Among the provinces and territories, notable changes occurred in Ontario (+15 incidents), Quebec (+10 incidents).” (Image: www150.statcan.gc.ca)

Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article

Almost any high student would tell you that in order to address a problem properly the first thing one has to do is to determine precisely the nature and the cause of the problem. 

In 2015, during the election and since, Prime Minister Trudeau championed his “diversity, equity and inclusion” (DEI) approach to the socio-cultural, religious, racial and economic problems and hate crimes facing the Canadian society. 

In the circumstances, one would think that in order to design one or more action plans to address hate crimes; he would insure that the type, quality and scope of statistics concerning this problem are capable of providing him with the kinds of information needed to formulate one or more effective strategies. As the matters stood to this day, the national statistics concerning hate crimes are in pretty poor shape

Well, he turned out to be the man who prefers to have  “policy based evidence rather than evidence based policy” as Ottawa blogger Darshan Maharaja aptly put ; to which I would add  “and a blind one stuck in the present” a subject I intend  to address in connection with DEI.

Previous slide
Next slide

Ongoing- Critical shortcomings of the national statistical data concerning antisemitic hate crimes 

Based on the serious shortcomings of the statistical evidence available to date and reviewed below the Trudeau government’s fight  against antisemitism and all other hate crimes comes across as a fake one on this account. The following texts provide an overview of these serious shortcomings:

2001– D.E. Janhevich, Hate Crime in Canada: An Overview of Issues and Data Sources provides a limited time perspective. However he also draws attention to a topic that has not been publicly debated since the publication of his work; namely, the benefits and disadvantages of collecting hate crime statistics:

The Benefits: 1. To Assess the magnitude of the problem; 2. To evaluate the criminal justice response and need for resources; 3. The unique nature of crime-disproportionate harm; 4.Creation of a social indicator and 5. Address the current criminal law agenda 

The Disadvantages of Collecting Hate Crime Statistics: 1. Creation of Moral panic; 2. Problems with the definition; [3.no longer the case.-omitted]; 4. Socially constructed problem and 5. Risk of adding to current tensions, Hate Crime in Canada: An Overview of Issues and Data Sources January 24, 2001, Statistics Canada -Archived 85-551-X1999000. Issue Number: 1999000. 

2018– On February 1, 2018, The Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage (the Committee) submitted its 10th Report entitled “Taking Action Against Systemic Racism and Religious Discrimination Including Islamophobia” to the House of Commons. (The Report) 

The report once again identified the serious shortcomings of the statistical data collection system and made a number of recommendations to get rid of the problems, one of which the absence of data on the racial ethnic, cultural religious identity of the offenders and victims. See: Parts 2 – 2.1 – 2.1.1- 2.1.2- 2.2- 2.2.1-2.2.2 – 2.2.3.

Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community

2018- The government responded to the report and recommendations of the House Standing Committee on Canadian Heritage with respect to Motion M- with a 21 page letter signed by Melanie Joly, then Minister of Canadian Heritage dated June 1, 2018

In pages 15 to 20 inclusive of the letter, the Minister focused on the issues of data and evidence on the persistence of racism and discrimination and emphasised government’s commitment to strengthen evidence based policy making. On this account, the Minister recognised the needs 

a. for better data on hate crime and hate incidents to ensure the safety and inclusion of the inhabitants of the country;

b. for extensive source of data  to provide on-going information on the nature and extent of hate crimes and hate incidents to obtain quality data;

to supplement Statistics Canada Uniform Crime Reporting Survey, Canada’s national database on police-reported hate crimes  that are reported on a monthly basis to Statistics Canada and released to the public on a yearly basis with  statistics concerning crimes that are  not reported to police or non-criminal hate incidents;

d. for the generation creation of extra-legal reporting options  to insure the inclusion of a national standardised database for any extra-legal reporting options;

e. for the generation of relevant and up to-date research on hate crime offenders in order to inform policies for counteracting hate and preventing hate-related criminality

f. to fix existing data gaps originating from

i. the data provided from the courts

ii. the significant variations in the reporting practices from one jurisdiction to another need for better data on hate crime and hate incidences;

iii. to fix the limited and inconsistent data from victims; and

iv. to fix the significant variation across jurisdictions in avenues for individuals to report hate incidents (as opposed to hate crimes). Accordingly, the Minister reported “that Public Safety Department will work with federal partners including the Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics at Statistics Canadas as well as with other levels of government and experts and stakeholders outside government to develop more effective strategies for gathering data and conducting analysis. Such strategies could include supporting Statistics Canada efforts to improve the quality and quantity of data provided by law enforcement and the courts, including to support more disaggregated accounts of the characteristics of victims and offenders

g. for more  in-depth qualitative and quantitative research specialists are required to work with the appropriate government agencies to develop a research agenda to address the specific characteristics and motivations of hate crime offenders as well as the needs of hate crime victims because  the police reported data provides few characteristics of the motivational origins and intentions behind hate crimes as well as their impacts on victims, and                                  

h. to  train law enforcement professionals  in cultural sensitivity, bias awareness and diversity mindfulness ,cultural competence in order to deal with incidents where hate is  or appears to be the motivating factor, and  to provide  the necessary  funding to agencies that provide such training.                                                                

Note: The rendition of the Minister’s narrative concerning hate crimes and incidents; the statistics concerning these crimes and incidents; law enforcement and sensitivity training is not verbatim. However, it is an accurate rendition of it  

2022- Jing Hui Wang and Greg Moreau, Police-reported hate crime in Canada, 2020 Canadian Centre for Justice and Community Safety Statistics, March 17, 2022

2022- Julian Roberts addressed the problems and limitations of the current statistical data collection system hate crimes in a national and international comparative perspective and formulated 20 valuable recommendations to remedy the current shortcomings. Disproportionate Harm: Hate Crime in Canada, Government of Canada August 25, 2022. 5. Recommendations and Conclusions.

P.S. Statistics Canada announced that sometime this month, it will be launching a new way of packaging and presenting statistical data. It remains to be seen whether this improvement will have a positive bearing on one or more of the problems identified above.

(to be cont’d with respect to refugees and immigration)

Doğan D. Akman is an independent researcher and commentator. He holds a B.Sc. in sociology, an M.A. in sociology/criminology and an LL.B in law. He held academic appointments in sociology, criminology and social policy; served as a Judge of the Provincial Court of Newfoundland and Labrador, and occupied the positions of Crown Counsel in criminal prosecutions and in civil litigation at the Federal Department of Justice. His academic work is published in peer-reviewed professional journals, while his opinion pieces and other writings are to be found in various publications and in blogs. 

Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article

Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article

Previous slide
Next slide

Read More

Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.

We do news differently!

Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.

We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.

But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!

Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.

Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.

We thank you for your ongoing support.

Happy reading!

Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.

We do news differently!

Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.

We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.

But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!

Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.

Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.

We thank you for your ongoing support.

Happy reading!

cOMING SOON…….

Breaking News

Recent

Features

News

Current Events

Opinions

Politics

Religion

Culture

Memoriam and Obituaries

PodcastS

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

About Us

Advertise with us

contact 

Subscribe Now

Receive the latest in community & international Jewish news direct to your inbox

© 2020 THEJ.CA, All Rights Reserved

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

About Us

Advertise with us

contact 

Subscribe Now

Receive the latest in community & international Jewish news direct to your inbox

© 2020 THEJ.CA, All Rights Reserved

Subscribe Now

Receive the latest in community & international Jewish news direct to your inbox

Terms and Conditions

Privacy Policy

About Us

Advertise with us

contact 

© 2020 THEJ.CA, All Rights Reserved