Ontario NDP Runs A Jew-Hater; Who Speaks For Hamilton’s Jews?
March 15, 2023
“Jewish state in Palestine… is a central organization for their international world swindle”
Popular Articles
Read More »
What’s Behind The Riots Over Judicial Reform In Israel?
March 15, 2023
Behind the Scene with David Bedein
‘Israel Not A Factor In Saudi Decision’ To Renew Ties With Iran
March 15, 2023
Riyadh’s distrust of Washington was a key calculation in the maneuver
Video: China’s Saudi-Iranian Pact: Respite Or Realignment?
March 15, 2023
Does the Communist China-brokered Saudi-Iranian pact signify a new Middle East or merely a respite between regional rivals?
In Search Of The Origins of Joseph, Canada’s First Jew
March 15, 2023
Direct proof of a Jewish presence in New France, 40 years before Esther Brandeau
The Trudeau Government’s Fake Fight Against Antisemitism- Part 36
March 15, 2023
Federal Parties: anti-Zionism and antisemitism
Israel Slams South Africa Parliament Decision To Downgrade Ties
March 15, 2023
The move will see Israel’s embassy in Pretoria downgraded to a liaison office
האיום הישראלי על איראן בחבל קווקז
March 15, 2023
הם חושדים שהישראלים משתפים פעולה עם האזרבייג’נים לא רק בנושא הנפט אלא גם כנקודת מוצא לתקיפות ישראליות נגד איראן כגון ריגול ופעילות אווירית, שלא לדבר על הברחות.
Azerbaijani Art and Culture Center Commemorates 31st Anniversary Of The Khojaly Genocide
March 15, 2023
“Voices of History” event held at University of Toronto
A Book Review Of Jewish Pride
March 15, 2023
Michael Steinhardt explains there are three pillars to Jewish pride
It’s time for honest answers
- 23 June 2022
- 4:03 am
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
- 23 June 2022
- 4:03 am
The Israeli/Palestinian peace process facilitated by U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry in 2013-2014, pictured below, failed for various reasons, including that neither side believed the other was serious about negotiations. (Photo: US State Department)
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
(FLAME via JNS) Pundits and politicians—especially in the West—have reflexively called for a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict for so long, the idea has lost any literal or useful meaning.
One of the two states—Israel—already exists, and its 74-year history provides clear definition. In a relatively short time, the Jewish state has become one of the world’s strongest democracies. It wields eminent political, economic and military influence globally. It is a staunch U.S. ally.
But what would “Palestine” look like? We have few referents for defining the opposite side of the two-state equation. We don’t know who would negotiate a Palestinian state or who would be in charge of it. We don’t know what the terms of a second state would be—like borders and peace agreements with Israel. We don’t know what the vision would be for the new state’s political, military and economic structure.
Why? We don’t know these very fundamental characteristics of a future “State of Palestine” because none of its proponents reveal them. We don’t know what the United States or European Union envision. Likewise, we don’t even know how the Palestinians imagine their new state.
Yet the answers to these questions—and many others—must be provided before rational people can embrace the heartwarming concept of a two-state solution.
How many Palestinians support such a solution?
What we know about Palestinian attitudes toward two states is not encouraging. A November 2021 poll found that only a paltry 29% of all Palestinians in the Gaza Strip and Judea and Samaria (“the West Bank”) believed a two-state solution is the best way to resolve the Israel-Palestinian conflict.
We should then ask those who advocate a two-state solution to explain: Why do you support something a majority of Palestinians do not? And: How do you propose to convince Palestinians that your opinion is worth more than theirs?”
We should also note that the Hamas-led dictatorship in Gaza—home of some two million Palestinians—violently opposes the two-state solution. Its solution, as defined by the Hamas Charter, is to destroy Israel.
Thus, two-state proponents must also answer: How realistic is a two-state solution if the militant jihadist group that rules 42% of the Palestinian population objects to it in principle?
Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community
Who will be in charge of a Palestinian state?
When we talk about peace with “the Palestinian people,” we have to acknowledge that there is no such political unit. The Palestinian Arabs of the region live in two disconnected areas and are ruled by two distinct, warring political groups.
The two Palestinian ruling parties—both dictatorships—are bitter enemies, whose attempts to reconcile over the last 17 years have failed utterly. Neither group—Fatah in the “West Bank” and Hamas in the Gaza Strip—has held elections since 2006.
When the United States and other mostly Western diplomats have attempted to conduct peace talks between Israel and the Palestinians, they assumed that Fatah represents the “real” Palestinians. They also assumed that in case of successful negotiations, Hamas would somehow “come along”—join the peace party. However, Hamas rabidly denies this, and there is zero evidence backing this assumption.
This raises a huge question for those who advocate a two-state solution: Even if the Fatah party were to accept peace with Israel—which they have refused to do for some 55 years—what makes you think Hamas would a) accept a peace deal in which they had no part and b) would not start a war to conquer the new “state” negotiated by Fatah?
Before we leave the key question of who speaks for the Palestinians, we really need to ask who represents the Palestinians in the “West Bank.”
Last time there were elections among the Palestinians, in 2006, Hamas won the majority of votes. They immediately seized Gaza and threw Fatah out (they also threw many off rooftops).
While current Palestinian Authority leader Mahmoud Abbas theoretically holds power in the West Bank, he is currently serving the 17th year of a four-year term. West Bank Palestinians have a bankrupt economy; they are propped up by financial contributions from Western nations. Most analysts agree, too, that if Israel did not assist in security in the Palestinian areas, Hamas would quickly take over.
Did we mention that Abbas is 87 years old and has no heir-apparent? Did we mention he cancelled the elections he originally called for this April or that 70% of his constituents want him removed from office? Thus, it’s entirely possible that when Abbas dies, Hamas will simply start ruling the West Bank’s 2.7 million Palestinians as a thugocracy, just as in Gaza.
A 2020 survey conducted by the Palestine Center for Public Opinion asked 500 interviewees “the top Palestinian national priority during the coming five years”: Two-thirds (66%) of West Bankers in this poll pick “regaining all of historical Palestine for the Palestinians”; only 14% choose “ending the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza, to achieve a two-state solution.” Gazan respondents are a bit more moderate: 56% want all of Palestine, while 31% prefer the two-state solution. (Image: washingtoninstitute.org)
What will a Palestinian state look like?
We know that Gaza is run by a designated Islamic terror organization, driven by jihadist ambitions and governed by Sharia law. We know Hamas doesn’t believe in democracy, nor in civil liberties, including elections. We know two of their written precepts: Kill Jews; destroy and conquer Israel.
We know that Fatah is equally undemocratic and equally opposes rule of law and basic civil freedoms. What’s more, we know the Palestinian Authority is notoriously corrupt—governed by nepotism, bribery and siphoning Western aid into the pockets of P.A. officials.
In short, the Palestinians have no tradition of Jeffersonian democracy, nor any leader who advocates it. Logically, we would expect the new Palestinian state to look like a toxic mix of the two current governments.
Thus, our final question for supporters of the two-state solution: What facts convince you that a new Palestinian state on Israel’s borders would be a responsible nation that honors freedom for its people and peace with its neighbors?
Who would trust—who honestly would want to risk—a brand new “State of Palestine” like this just a few miles from Jerusalem on Israel’s western border? Under current circumstances, not many Palestinians—and surely not many Israelis.
The idea of a two-state solution has become empty rhetoric—a shallow proposal that raises more questions than it answers. Unfortunately, when we answer those tough questions honestly, rather than portray an inspiring dream of liberation, they portend a nightmare—for the Palestinian people, and especially for Israel.
James Sinkinson is president of Facts and Logic About the Middle East (FLAME), which publishes educational messages to correct lies and misperceptions about Israel and its relationship to the United States.
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
Read More
Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.
We do news differently!
Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.
We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.
But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!
Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.
Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.
We thank you for your ongoing support.
Happy reading!
Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.
We do news differently!
Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.
We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.
But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!
Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.
Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.
We thank you for your ongoing support.
Happy reading!
Sponsored Content
cOMING SOON…….
Breaking News
Recent
Features
News
Current Events
Opinions
Politics
Religion
Culture
Memoriam and Obituaries
PodcastS
Subscribe Now
Receive the latest in community & international Jewish news direct to your inbox