Weak Sarah Jama “Apology” Accepted By Weak Jewish Community “Leaders”
March 22, 2023
CIJA throws the Jews of Hamilton under the progressive NDP train
Popular Articles
Read More »
Never Again? Germany Dedicates UNRWA School In Gaza
March 22, 2023
Will it be devoid of anti-Israel indoctrination and antisemitic incitement?
Hungary Is A Quiet Jewish Success Story
March 22, 2023
Unlike in the rest of Europe, Jews are safe and thriving in Hungary
The Trudeau Government’s Fake Fight Against Antisemitism- Part 37
March 22, 2023
Is the Green Party led a ‘foreign agent’?
B’nai Brith Canada Applauds Alberta Legislative Assembly’s Endorsement Of IHRA Definition
March 22, 2023
“We are grateful to the ALA for its continued support of the Jewish people”
Biblical Prophecy Revealed In Tel Aviv Protests
March 22, 2023
Hi-tech elitists leading anti-Netanyahu uprisings are bailed out by Israeli banks
Why Non-Jews Must Also Be Concerned About A Nuclear Armed Iran
March 22, 2023
‘This is probably the darkest era in the Persian people’s history’
Armenia, The Spanish Inquisition And The Modern-Day Pharaohs
March 22, 2023
Less than 100 Jews live in Armenia today
Who Are The Top Traders Of Russian Oil Despite International Sanctions?
March 22, 2023
The oil trade is now weaning away from payments in US dollars
Watch: Behind The Scene With David Bedein
March 22, 2023
Israel’s Proposed Judicial Reform
Previous
Next
Previous
Next
“The report hides behind misleading claims of ‘academic freedom’ to treat Jewish concerns with an extraordinary level of hesitation”: Douglas Sandoval, managing editor of CAMERA on Campus.
- 15 December 2021
- 11:07 pm
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
- 15 December 2021
- 11:07 pm
“U of T has a shameful past of antisemitism and as long as antisemitism persists in Canada, Jews at U of T may encounter it on campus as well,” stated three Jewish professors last October. (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
(JNS) The University of Toronto will adopt all the recommendations from its working group on antisemitism at the school, but Jewish groups say the recommendations, and the report itself, don’t go nearly far enough to address an increasingly anti-Jewish atmosphere there.
Particularly concerning is the decision not to endorse any definition of antisemitism, including the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance’s working definition of antisemitism, which has been adopted by some 30 countries, including Canada, and was backed by many Jewish groups.
Calling the report a “path backward,” Michael Mostyn, CEO of B’nai Brith Canada said: “This report is beyond disappointing and demonstrates that U of T does not take antisemitism seriously.
“It is unfathomable that the IHRA definition was adopted by the Canadian government, as well as the Province of Ontario, but somehow remains ‘unworthy’ for this academic institution,” he said. “Hate and discrimination clearly persist at U of T, and Jewish students deserved a report to improve that antisemitic atmosphere.”
The University of Toronto convened the working group on anti-Semitism in December 2020 to address concerns from students and faculty that not enough was being done to combat Jew-hatred on its campuses. The release of the report on antisemitism comes just days after the Scarborough Center Student Union approved a measure that supports the BDS movement, which drew outrage after it banned “pro-Israel” kosher caterers. That ban was later walked back by the student union.
Previous
Next
Previous
Next
In a press release, the chair of the working group, Arthur Ripstein, who is a professor of law and philosophy at the university, said: “Our aim in drafting this report is to make realistic and actionable recommendations of the ways that the university can move forward in addressing it and to ensure that U of T is a place where Jewish members of the community feel safe and welcome.”
He stated that “the reason that we are not recommending the adoption of the IHRA, or other definitions, is that all of them are designed for different purposes. They are not suitable to the distinctive context of the university. Adoption of them would not integrate with the requirements on us and our other existing policy commitments.”
The group also spoke of the need for the university to keep to its commitment of academic freedom and advised that it not ban events, including those “events related to Israel and Palestine.”
“The protection of academic freedom and the broader place of the university in a democratic society require the protection of unpopular views at every level of the university,” they wrote, saying that “as a place where controversial issue are addressed and debated, the university must not be seen to have taken a side simply by permitting a view to be expressed” or by inviting academic speakers from particular countries.
That recommendation, said Mostyn, will like encourage those student groups and academics who present anti-Israel programming on campus to continue to do so.
Get thej.ca a Pro Israel Voice by Email. Never miss a top story that effects you, your family & your community
‘Use own free-speech rights to educate about antisemitism, bigotry’
Other recommendations of the working group include ensuring that kosher food is readily available on its campuses and that allowances be made for Jewish observance of major holidays without requiring proof of a person’s level of observance.
“While we thank the committee for putting forward this report, we remain concerned that the recommendations offered do not address the problems of anti-Semitism that students are facing on the ground,” said Jaime Kirzner-Roberts, director of policy at the Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center. “The University of Toronto’s failure to adopt the IHRA definition of antisemitism shows a lack of commitment and courage in fighting the scourge of Jew-hatred that we have sadly seen rearing its ugly head on campus for years.”
Similar sentiments were expressed by Steven Greenwood, executive director StandWithUs Canada. He noted that it remains unclear how the University of Toronto will be able “to effectively identify and address antisemitism if it cannot clearly define the different ways in which this bigotry manifests. Contrary to the misleading framing of the issue by the university’s working group, adopting such a definition does not mean banning campus events or denying the right to free speech. Rather, it enables university leaders to use their own free-speech rights to effectively educate about antisemitism and condemn incidents of this bigotry when they occur.”
The senior director of Hillel at the University of Toronto, Rabbi Ariella Rosen, posted a message on Facebook saying that “the time has come for the University of Toronto to take meaningful action to root out antisemitism and to ensure campus remains a safe and welcoming place for all students. Hillel U of T is committed to working with university leadership to ensure the recommendations are fully adopted in a timely fashion. … Hillel will continue to work with our partners on campus to counter anti-Semitism, and prioritize the safety and well-being of Jewish students.”
“While we acknowledge the report affirms the basic right to Jewish life on (U of Toronto) campus,” stated Jaime Kirzner-Roberts of FSWC, “we ultimately see it as a missed opportunity to properly deal with the numerous forms of antisemitism Jewish university students and faculty members continue to face.” (Photo: Twitter)
In a press release tied to the report, university officials said they are “profoundly opposed to antisemitism” and “determined to ensure our campuses are places where members of the Jewish community feel that they are safe, included and respected as members and friends of the U of T community.”
Jewish groups, however, insist that there is no concrete way to do so if antisemitism isn’t defined in the first place.
“The report published by the University of Toronto Anti-Semitism Working Group hides behind misleading claims of ‘academic freedom’ and criticism of IHRA’s working definition of antisemitism to treat Jewish concerns with an extraordinary level of hesitation absent from similar University of Toronto reports on other minority groups,” said Douglas Sandoval, managing editor of CAMERA on Campus. “There is only one truly substantive recommendation in the entire report, while most of the rest simply suggest the university should treat antisemitism as seriously as other forms of discrimination.”
He added that “if the university was not taking antisemitism seriously before, then surely these recommendations are shockingly inadequate. Unfortunately, the report itself is a case study on how antisemitism continues to not be taken seriously.”
Faygie Holt is an award-winning journalist and bestselling children’s book author. Her work has appeared in newspapers and magazines around the world and has been translated into several languages.
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
Click an icon above to share, email, or save this article
Previous
Next
Previous
Next
Read More
Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.
We do news differently!
Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.
We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.
But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!
Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.
Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.
We thank you for your ongoing support.
Happy reading!
Thank you for choosing TheJ.Ca as your source for Canadian Jewish News.
We do news differently!
Our positioning as a Zionist News Media platform sets us apart from the rest. While other Canadian Jewish media are advocating increasingly biased progressive political and social agendas, TheJ.Ca is providing more and more readers with a welcome alternative and an ideological home.
We revealed the incursion of anti-Israel progressive elements such as IfNotNow into our communities. We have exposed the distorted hateful agenda of the “progressive” left political radicals who brought Linda Sarsour to our cities, and we were first to report on many disturbing incidents of Nazi-based hate towards Jews across Canada.
But we can’t do it alone. We need your HELP!
Our ability to thrive and grow in 2020 and beyond depends on the generosity of committed readers and supporters like you.
Monthly support is a great way to help us sustain our operations. We greatly appreciate any contributions you can make to support Jewish Journalism.
We thank you for your ongoing support.
Happy reading!
Sponsored Content
cOMING SOON…….
Breaking News
Recent
Features
News
Current Events
Opinions
Politics
Religion
Culture
Memoriam and Obituaries
PodcastS
Subscribe Now
Receive the latest in community & international Jewish news direct to your inbox